ZORRO: changing from defence to attack

The magic legand of characterr "ZORRO" has a significant impression in my thinking. Behind the historical period before united states building, and in circunstances of loss of security, Zorro must be present. The movie concentrated on the people need for trusted leadership to provide security. Also american perfecting added some notices to discuss. First, Zorro did not kill any one in the movie. All his hits for defence purposes only. You would not find any bloody seen in the movies in despite the dangers in all sites around the hero. In real life, this can not occur due to the differences betwee the concepts of attach and defence. United states nowadays penetrates oceans and seas with huge military forces to arrest a little of Taliban and some little terrorist. US says that operations for the defence purposes. How? A thousand of kilometers and billions of dollars paid were paid with no real need. This is military attack and without americans agreement. Also this attack sho how the US become wild. The enlarging strategic plans for US miss the spirit of zorro. Arab need zorro. Arab refusing to Bin laden is another verification for the strongly recommended desire for establishing fair and real world without the control of great power. This may be unreal. But that what should be occur with no mistakes in exlaining the difference between defense and attack.